========================

What are we going to do?

========================

·    We are going to discuss the following:

o   As a result of the teaching component occupying a crucial central role in the Great Commission, watering down the teaching component in terms of the meticulous exhaustiveness of what Jesus has commanded hinders the Great Commission.

o   Why are there so many disciple-making movements among unreached peoples on the mission field?

o   The Discovery Bible Study can be expanded to become the Catechized Bible Study in order to meet Jesus’ spec for the teaching component of the Great Commission.

o   Why are there so few disciple-making movements in North America?

o   Indiscriminately importing simple things that work on the mission field into North America is contextually inappropriate.

o   The teaching component of the Great Commission requires quality control.

o   Adjustments need to be made in DMM to make it effective for more segments of the population in North America.

========================

What are we going to do?

========================

 

 

 

 

========================

Watering down the teaching component of the Great Commission hinders the Great Commission

========================

 

Matthew 28:19-20 (King James Version)

19Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:

20Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world. Amen.

 

Matthew 28:19-20 (New International Version)

19Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,

20and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.

 

In the Great Commission Jesus defined the three components of making disciples as follows:

·    Baptizing the disciples in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.

·    Teaching the disciples all things whatsoever Jesus has commanded.

·    Ensuring that the disciples obey all things whatsoever Jesus has commanded.

 

The baptism component is a one-time event and straightforward.  We are not going to elaborate on this component of making disciples in the Great Commission.  What remains then is the component of teaching the disciples all things whatsoever Jesus has commanded and the component of ensuring that the disciples obey all things whatsoever Jesus has commanded.  There is a clear dependency relationship between the two remaining components that until they are taught all things whatsoever Jesus has commanded, the disciples would not be able to likewise obey.  Successful execution of the teaching component is therefore the precondition for successful execution of the obedience component in the Great Commission.  Consequently the teaching component occupies a crucial central role in the Great Commission.  For the rest of the discussion we are going to focus on the teaching component.

 

As discussed in the document ‘The Catechized Disciple-Making Church-Planting Movement’, modern English translations of the bible run the risk of watering down the Great Commission in neglecting to bring out the aspect of meticulous exhaustiveness of what Jesus has commanded while older and more literal English translations such as the King James Version and the Young's Literal Translation do not incur that risk because they do not carry that negligence.  As a result of the teaching component occupying a crucial central role in the Great Commission, such watering down hinders the Great Commission.

========================

Watering down the teaching component of the Great Commission hinders the Great Commission

========================

 

 

 

 

========================

Why are there so many disciple-making movements among unreached peoples on the mission field?

========================

In the early days of the Disciple-Making Movement (DMM) among the Bhojpuri language group of North India the Discovery Bible Study is the means for non-believers to come to faith in Jesus.  After they became disciples, they would continue to use the Discovery Group format to study the bible for the sake of being taught to obey what Jesus has commanded.  This facet of the DMM is documented in the book by the missionary David Watson who started the DMM.

 

Watson, David; Watson, Paul. Contagious Disciple Making (p. 129). Thomas Nelson. Kindle Edition.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We train disciple-makers to enter new communities after extensive prayer. When disciple-makers enter the community, they look for ways to meet the felt needs of the community through service, education, or business. As they meet these needs, they are meeting people and sharing openly about the Kingdom of God. When the Person of Peace reveals him- or herself, the disciple-maker shifts the focus to the Family of Peace. The disciple-maker starts a Discovery Group to help the family discover on their own who God is and how they must relate to Him. The disciple-maker teaches them how to study the Word of God, but does not lead the Bible studies or do any of the preaching and teaching. The focus is on the family learning directly from God through His Word. The disciple-maker guides the direction of the study, but does not conduct the study, except to model the process a few times in the beginning.

 

When the family comes to Christ, the disciple-maker helps them to move from being a Bible study group to fulfilling all the requirements of church. A leader is identified and trained to lead the group and to establish more groups through the family’s network of friends and family. Disciples make more disciples. Leaders equip more leaders. Groups establish more groups. Churches plant more churches.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Disciples in the Discovery Bible Study consistently apply the following three questions to bible passages being studied in an attempt to interpret and apply them:

·    What does this bible passage teach you about God?

·    What does this bible passage teach you about people?

·    What would you do in response to this bible passage?

 

The Discovery Bible Study falls short of Jesus’ spec for the teaching component of the Great Commission.  The human facilitation of guidance that is implied in the teaching component of the Great Commission is barely available except through these high-level questions.  Practitioners of DMM often quote John 6:45 to justify delegating responsibility for the teaching component of the Great Commission to God.

 

John 6:45

45It is written in the Prophets: ‘They will all be taught by God.’ Everyone who has heard the Father and learned from him comes to me.

 

Please note that the Great Commission was given by Jesus to the disciples.  The teaching component of the Great Commission is the responsibility of the disciples and not that of God.  Delegating responsibility for the teaching component to God is not consistent with what Jesus intended.

 

But regardless of the shortfall in meeting Jesus’ spec for the teaching component of the Great Commission, there are many ongoing DMM’s around the world.  An article entitled ‘1% of the World: A Macroanalysis of 1,369 Movements to Christ’ by Justin Long was carried in the November-December 2020 issue of Mission Frontiers.  It states:

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

An engagement is counted as a movement when it consistently sees four generations of disciples gathered in churches, in multiple streams. Although not every movement has a minimum measure of total disciples, most use the 1,000 disciple minimum. Even if they don’t use that measure, four generations in multiple streams means a movement would normally be close to or greater than 1,000 disciples. Counting this way, we know of 1,369 movements.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Of all the counted movements the biggest one reaches 12 million disciples among the Bhojpuri language group of North India as cited by the following book by Victor John who is the native leader of the movement:

 

John, Victor. Bhojpuri Breakthrough: A Movement that Keeps Multiplying (p. 12). WIGTake Resources. Kindle Edition.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This movement has some amazing numbers. Hindu fundamentalists with extensive political grass-roots census efforts claim there are now 12 million Christians among the Bhojpuri language group of North India when 25 years ago such Christians were almost non-existent. Bhojpuri leaders long ago gave up on trying to count, since the movement has exploded beyond human control and monitoring. Outside audits by missionary researchers over the last 10 years point clearly to tens of thousands of churches and millions of baptized believers.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

The book was published in 2019 and that puts the movement at its 28th year in 2022.

 

Disciples in this DMM apply the afore-mentioned three questions to bible passages for interpretation and application.  It would appear that handling the teaching component of the Great Commission in an inadequate manner has no impact on the local execution of the Great Commission at all!  Jesus seems to have allowed this gigantic DMM and many others to proceed even when they do not meet his spec for the teaching component of the Great Commission.  Has Jesus not abided by the verbiage of the Great Commission in granting these movements on the mission field?

 

Not necessarily that Jesus has not.  Since on the mission field there are very few existing disciples and churches, new disciples that owe their existence to these nascent movements have no knowledge of the bible.  As a result these disciples getting together and applying the afore-mentioned three questions to bible passages in an attempt to interpret and apply them is a very good start for them.  Teaching them to obey all things whatsoever Jesus has commanded is simply not an option at that stage of their movement. 

 

Mark 2:23-28

23One Sabbath Jesus was going through the grainfields, and as his disciples walked along, they began to pick some heads of grain.

24The Pharisees said to him, “Look, why are they doing what is unlawful on the Sabbath?”

25He answered, “Have you never read what David did when he and his companions were hungry and in need?

26In the days of Abiathar the high priest, he entered the house of God and ate the consecrated bread, which is lawful only for priests to eat. And he also gave some to his companions.”

27Then he said to them, “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath.

28So the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath.

 

Jesus permitted not observing the Sabbath by the letter of the law for the sake of meeting a pressing need.  Likewise he permits not fully meeting his spec for the teaching component of the Great Commission for the sake of meeting the pressing need of the unreached people on the mission field as long as the new disciples are doing their best to meet the spec.  That is how there are so many DMM’s on the mission field today.  Had Jesus required full compliance with his spec right from the beginning of these movements, none of them would have come into existence.

 

One might say that the above passage of the bible has nothing to do with mission.  Well, the story of David and his companions has nothing to do with the Sabbath either.  That did not stop Jesus from quoting it to drive home his view of the Sabbath.

========================

Why are there so many disciple-making movements among unreached peoples on the mission field?

========================

 

 

 

 

========================

The Discovery Bible Study can be expanded to become the Catechized Bible Study

========================

But what Jesus permitted for nascent movements on the mission field at their beginning does not mean that he continues to permit it indefinitely. 

 

A further look at the book by Victor John yields the following at p. 212, p. 213 and p. 219.

 

John, Victor. Bhojpuri Breakthrough: A Movement that Keeps Multiplying (p. 212). WIGTake Resources. Kindle Edition.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- What does a typical house church meeting look like?

 

A house church does not necessarily meet in a house. Usually it does, but it might meet in an open field or courtyard. A house church (worshiping community) is one that meets anywhere other than a designated “church building.” The location doesn’t matter, nor does the time or frequency of the meetings. Typically a house church has 40-100 people, often meeting in someone’s courtyard with a sheet of plastic set up for shade.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

John, Victor. Bhojpuri Breakthrough: A Movement that Keeps Multiplying (p. 213). WIGTake Resources. Kindle Edition.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A house church gathering includes people who have been discipled, some who are being discipled, and some who are interested. Many house fellowships have a few people who have not yet been baptized, and are preparing for baptism.

 

The gathering usually consists of singing a lot of worship songs in the local language, prayer, Bible reading, and testimonies. Also praying for the sick, talking about struggles and challenges people face in their lives, and then bringing everything to prayer. Then someone preaches or teaches from the Word of God, usually for between one hour and an hour and 20 minutes. This may include interruptions, comments, and questions. The time is interactive; not just a one-way lecture. They have an offering, which sometimes in rural churches consists of giving in kind rather than money. Most groups share the Lord’s Supper together monthly; others do so twice a month or weekly. It varies from area to area. The elders of the church (not just men but also women) pray and serve the Lord’s Supper.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

John, Victor. Bhojpuri Breakthrough: A Movement that Keeps Multiplying (p. 219). WIGTake Resources. Kindle Edition.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- What is the role of teaching and preaching in the movement?

 

As already mentioned, teaching and preaching of the Word is a regular part of the believers’ gatherings. Teaching also takes place every month in the advanced leadership training, which gets passed on through the generations of the movement. Conferences and seminars also include teaching and preaching. But we don’t emphasize preaching as something done by special people. Preaching can be done by a variety of people.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Apparently teaching and preaching at church gatherings is how this gigantic DMM currently meets Jesus’ spec for the teaching component of the Great Commission 28 years into its existence, since the disciples of this movement have matured and are capable of providing the necessary teaching that Jesus would no longer exempt them from.  On a practical note if such teaching continues to be missing, the movement itself will likely become unsustainable.  So Jesus’ spec for the teaching component of the Great Commission itself serves a practical purpose for the movement.

 

This DMM that is the biggest in size of all movements and that has emphasized Discovery Bible Study for teaching and has shied away from preaching right from the beginning now resorts to preaching for meeting Jesus’ spec for the teaching component of the Great Commission for its own survival.  But what happens to holding disciples accountable for obedience to what they have been taught apart from the group accountability that is effectively done in the small Discovery Group?  Is there now a deviation from the obedience-based discipleship in this movement?  That only people in the movement can answer.

 

In reality there is no need for this DMM to deviate from its original charter of using bible study as the tool for teaching the disciples if the Discovery Bible Study is expanded to become the Catechized Bible Study that can meet Jesus’ spec for the teaching component of the Great Commission.  For a discussion of the Catechized Bible Study please refer to the documents ‘The Catechized Disciple-Making Church-Planting Movement’ and ‘How CDMCPM Differs from DMM and CPM’.

 

Mark 1:40-42

40A man with leprosy came to him and begged him on his knees, “If you are willing, you can make me clean.”

41Jesus was indignant. He reached out his hand and touched the man. “I am willing,” he said. “Be clean!”

42Immediately the leprosy left him and he was cleansed.

 

To see how the Catechized Bible Study can be an effective tool for teaching the disciples what Jesus has commanded, please refer to the APPENDIX for the questions and suggested answers for Mark 1:40-42 that are excerpted from the Catechized Bible Study light of the Gospel of Mark for Evangelism.

========================

The Discovery Bible Study can be expanded to become the Catechized Bible Study

========================

 

 

 

 

========================

Why are there so few disciple-making movements in North America?

========================

Now that we have addressed the question of why there are so many disciple-making movements among unreached peoples on the mission field, let’s turn to the question of why there are so few of them in North America where there is no lack of people who pursue them.  In North America where disciples are many and have a vast reserve of biblical expertise, Jesus’ spec for the teaching component of the Great Commission must be met before he would consider granting a movement.

 

On a practical note there is a purpose for Jesus’ spec for the teaching component of the Great Commission. People in North America have much built-in resistance in their worldview against transformation by the biblical worldview.  Teaching is required even during evangelism to effect a worldview transformation in non-believers that nudges them toward repentance and belief in the good news.  The Catechized Bible Study light of the Gospel of Mark for Evangelism has a focus on the cost of discipleship and what it means to be a self-giving disciple following the self-giving Christ.  During the bible study non-believers are made aware of the fact that as disciples they are expected to deny themselves, take up their cross to follow Jesus and practice the principle of servanthood in leadership.  Worldview transformation needs to be ongoing even after the non-believers become disciples for it to eventually reach the point of completion.

 

Jesus did not multiply the disciples before he died and rose from the dead because the worldview of the disciples had not yet been transformed.  They were still self-serving disciples following what they thought to be the self-serving Christ.  When Jesus died, the disciples’ dream was dashed to pieces.  The idea of their being self-serving disciples following the self-serving Christ was finally put to rest.  When Jesus rose from the dead, they had turned from being self-serving disciples following the self-serving Christ to being self-giving disciples following the self-giving Christ.  That was the power of Jesus’ resurrection in the worldview transformation of the disciples.  It was then that Jesus did a rapid multiplication of the disciples in the book of Acts. 

 

Therefore transformation of the worldview of the disciples is crucial for their multiplication.  Turning from disobedience to obedience to Jesus’ commands and being held accountable for it is part of it.  DMM practitioners who desire to see multiplication of disciples need to make sure that their evangelism and discipleship tools can effect transformation of the worldview of non-believers and newly-committed disciples.

 

Even when Jesus’ spec for the teaching component of the Great Commission has been met, it does not mean that Jesus would automatically grant a disciple-making movement in North America though it is definitely one step closer, because there are other factors that need to be taken into consideration.  Not the least is the reality that a movement with large numbers of disciples and churches coming into existence within a relatively short period of time is a de facto revival of the church.  So the issue becomes broadened from Jesus granting a movement in North America to Jesus granting a revival of the church in North America.  The latter is a much broader issue and far more complex than the former.  We are not going to drill down on this because it involves much speculation.

 

On the other hand some disciple-making movements have been reported in North America.  They mostly involve Diaspora populations and so these movements involve factors outside of North America.  We are not going to look into these external factors. 

 

Finally there are some segments of the population in North America that seem to be more susceptible to disciple-making movement than the rest, for instance, the prison population and people who find themselves in difficult situations.  These segments of population can be likened to unreached peoples on the mission field that fully meeting Jesus’ spec for the teaching component of the Great Commission among disciples in these segments of population and then requiring them to reproduce what they have been taught to help the disciples they make is not feasible.  Gathering them into a Discovery Bible Study and having them consistently apply the afore-mentioned three questions to bible passages in an attempt to interpret and apply them is a very good start for them.  They would then be able to do likewise with the disciples they in turn make.  Furthermore there is a pressing need in these segments of population and so Jesus grants them a movement.

========================

Why are there so few disciple-making movements in North America?

========================

 

 

 

 

========================

Indiscriminately importing simple things that work on the mission field into North America is contextually inappropriate

========================

As a result of the lack of movement, DMM practitioners in North America strive to keep everything simple, especially the Discovery Bible Study, in hope that movement would ensue.  They would say that simple things multiply and that complex things don’t.  Such a claim is not really true.  Biological cells are very complex yet they replicate and multiply.  As long as the mechanism for replication and the condition that is conducive to replication exist, an entity will replicate and multiply regardless of how complex it is.  That is how life exists and continues on planet earth.

 

Intentionally keeping the Discovery Bible Study very simple so that everybody can do it for the sake of starting a movement is self-defeating in North America.  In reality meeting Jesus’ spec for the teaching component of the Great Commission should be primary for facilitating movement; keeping things simple should be secondary and should be done only after Jesus’ spec for the teaching component has been met.  Indiscriminately importing simple things that work on the mission field into North America is contextually inappropriate.  A little bit of contextualization would help.

 

The Catechized Bible Study can be quite complex in terms of the biblical content it delivers yet most disciples would be able to facilitate it, because the biblical content has been explicitly laid out as questions and answers.  Biblical expertise of the facilitator is not the crucial factor in teaching the disciples in this case thus making the Catechized Bible Study reproducible.  It is an example of pursuing the meeting of Jesus’ spec for the teaching component of the Great Commission as primary and the simplification of the tool so that everybody can do it as secondary.

 

There is a difference in the skill set required of a disciple who facilitates the Catechized Bible Study and a disciple who facilitates the Discovery Bible Study for both to do well.  Since the content of the Catechized Bible Study has been explicitly laid out, the facilitator mostly needs to be skilled in the technique of conducting a bible study.  On the other hand the facilitator of the Discovery Bible Study would need to have expertise in the bible in addition to being skilled in the technique of conducting a bible study to be effective.  Keeping the Discovery Bible Study simple for the sake of starting a movement unexpectedly puts a burden on the facilitator who is supposed to be just a regular disciple.

========================

Indiscriminately importing simple things that work on the mission field into North America is contextually inappropriate

========================

 

 

 

 

========================

The teaching component of the Great Commission requires quality control

========================

Because the teaching component occupies a crucial central role in the Great Commission, we need to be able to readily monitor it for quality control in order to fix problems there might be along the way.  The Catechized Bible Study is completely transparent because its content is completely laid out.  Quality control can be readily assessed and applied.  The same is not true of the Discovery Bible Study since what ends up being discussed can vary significantly from group to group.  Leaders in DMM would have difficulties ascertaining the overall quality of their teaching component, let alone people on the outside.  That makes it difficult for the leaders to assess how far off they are from meeting Jesus’ spec for the teaching component of the Great Commission.

========================

The teaching component of the Great Commission requires quality control

========================

 

 

 

 

========================

Adjustments need to be made in DMM to make it effective for more segments of the population in North America

========================

DMM seems to be effective for some segments of the population in North America but not the others.  Adjustments need to be made in DMM to make it effective for more segments of the population in North America.

========================

Adjustments need to be made in DMM to make it effective for more segments of the population in North America

========================

 

 

 

 

========================

APPENDIX

=======================

 

Mark 1:40-42

40A man with leprosy came to him and begged him on his knees, “If you are willing, you can make me clean.”

41Jesus was indignant. He reached out his hand and touched the man. “I am willing,” he said. “Be clean!”

42Immediately the leprosy left him and he was cleansed.

----------------------------------------

 

·  The facilitator provides participants with the following information on leprosy in Jesus’ days:

----------------------------------------

1)       During Jesus’ time what were the socio-religious rules concerning people who had leprosy?

o   A leper

§  Was considered unclean.

§  Could not live in the community and had to live away from the community.

§  Had to wear torn clothes and let the hair of his head be unkempt.

§  Had to cover the lower part of his face and cry out, ‘Unclean, unclean’.

§  Was not allowed to come within feet of other people.

o   A person who touched a leper became unclean.

----------------------------------------

 

2)       According to verses 40 and 41 did the leper break the socio-religious rules the way he approached Jesus and why?

o   Yes, because he came within close proximity of Jesus such that Jesus could touch him.

 

3)       What did begging on his knees before Jesus indicate?

o   It indicated

§  Humility.

§  Earnestness.

 

4)       According to verse 40 what made the leper consider himself to be unclean, given that he equated the healing of his leprosy to making him clean?

o   He considered himself to be unclean because of his leprosy. 

 

5)       Was the leper’s need for healing more psychological than physical and why?

o   Yes, because feeling unclean is not a physical but a psychological condition.

 

6)       According to what he said in verse 40 did the leper think that Jesus was able to heal him of his leprosy and why?

o   Yes, because to the leper it was a matter of whether Jesus was willing to heal him or not.

 

7)       According to verse 40 did the leper’s faith in Jesus’ ability to heal him translate into his confidence of Jesus’ willingness to heal and why?

o   No, because he was expressing uncertainty about Jesus’ willingness to heal him in saying to Jesus, “If you are willing, you can make me clean.”

 

8)       Why did the leper come within close proximity of Jesus so that it would be possible for Jesus to touch him, given that social acceptance is important for a leper?

o   The leper was longing for social acceptance from Jesus.

 

9)       According to verse 41 did Jesus break the socio-religious rules in the way he acted toward the leper and why?

o   Yes, because he touched the leper.

 

10)   According to verses 41 and 42 did Jesus really need to touch the leper in order to heal the leper of his leprosy and why?

o   No, Jesus could have just said the words and the leper would still have been healed because the leprosy immediately left the man upon Jesus uttering those words. 

 

11)   Why then did Jesus touch the leper?

o   Jesus touched the leper to show his social acceptance of the leper.

 

12)   Had Jesus healed the leper without touching him, would Jesus have accepted the leper socially?

o   No.

 

13)   Had Jesus not accepted the leper socially, would Jesus have healed the leper emotionally?

o   No.

 

14)   According to verse 41 did Jesus accept the leper socially first and then heal him of leprosy or did Jesus heal the leper of leprosy first and then accept him socially?

o   Jesus touched the leper to accept him socially first and then verbally healed him of his leprosy.

 

15)   Why was it important for Jesus to touch the leper first before healing him of his leprosy, given that social acceptance of the leper is done while he still has leprosy?

o   The only way for Jesus to accept the leper socially was to touch him first before healing him of his leprosy.

 

16)   Would the leper have been healed emotionally if he had stayed at a distance and why?

o   No, because then Jesus could not have touched the leper and accepted him socially.

 

17)   Did the leper get to know Jesus better and in what way?

o   Yes, the leper realized that Jesus was not only willing to heal him physically but also accept him socially.

========================

APPENDIX

=======================